The best and worst performing individual pension funds over the last 5 years show a massive difference. So do the best and worst performing ‘Balanced Managed Funds’
Best Individual Fund (Bid – Bid price) + 212%
Worst Individual Fund (Bid – Bid price) – 63.87%
Best Balanced Fund (Bid – Bid) + 50.27%
Worst Balanced Managed Fund (Bid – Bid price) -7.53%
Source – Financial Express 15/10/10
In recent weeks the media have been paying particular attention to the charges applied to pension funds but little has been reported about good and bad investment performance so we thought we should find out. As you can see the differences between good and bad is staggering.
To get best value from your pension you need reasonable charges and decent performance. You also need to ensure your funds are invested in a way which reflects your own attitude to investment risk.
A structured investment portfolio will, taking into account your attitude to investment risk, spread your investments across different market sectors and different parts of the world in varying proportion. This is called asset allocation. The higher your attitude to risk the more speculative your investments are. High risk carries opportunity for high returns BUT also a higher risk of losing money. Low risk has little opportunity for real growth BUT offers some stability in troubled times.
When you select an attitude to investment risk you can only ever choose based on your thinking and market conditions at the time. Because circumstances and attitudes change you need to be reviewing your attitude to risk on a regular basis.
We would recommend this be done annually.
In addition, because rising markets tend to increase the proportion of your fund which is equity based this by default increases your exposure to risk. This needs to be addressed by re balancing your fund, we recommend annually, to ensure your investments continue to reflect your own attitude.
Re balancing your fund is a term for adjusting your asset allocation back to the correct attitude to risk and should be done even if you remain invested in the same individual investments within your pension portfolio.
Reviewing your plans annually also provides the opportunity to switch some funds about if the performance has not lived up to expectation.
For simplicity and sometimes regulatory reasons many high street branded pensions have been sold with the investments selected by default in to Managed Funds. You may have been asked to select between a Cautious, Balanced or Adventurous but that is probably as far as the adviser was authorised to go.
Unfortunately these managed funds have tended to perform poorly and as our research indicates with massively different degrees of success.
To make matters worse the volatility and risk rating of many of these Managed Funds is not reflected in the title.
Further research, using information from ‘Financial Express’, indicates that on a risk rating of 1 – 10 with 1 being low and 10 being high the majority of ‘Balanced Managed Funds’ have, over the last 3 years, been rated as 8, 9 or 10.
If you are concerned about your investment returns or the risk rating of your investments you should get your pensions reviewed by an independent pension specialist as soon as possible.
Pensionlite provide free, independent, no obligation pension review and recommendation reports. Why wait – www.pensionlite.co.uk
The best and worst performing individual pension funds over the last 5 years show a massive difference. So do the best and worst performing ‘Balanced Managed Funds’
Best Individual Fund (Bid – Bid price) + 212%
Worst Individual Fund (Bid – Bid price) – 63.87%
Best Balanced Fund (Bid – Bid) + 50.27%
Worst Balanced Managed Fund (Bid – Bid price) -7.53%
Source – Financial Express 15/10/10
In recent weeks the media have been paying particular attention to the charges applied to pension funds but little has been reported about good and bad investment performance so we thought we should find out. As you can see the differences between good and bad is staggering.
To get best value from your pension you need reasonable charges and decent performance. You also need to ensure your funds are invested in a way which reflects your own attitude to investment risk.
A structured investment portfolio will, taking into account your attitude to investment risk, spread your investments across different market sectors and different parts of the world in varying proportion. This is called asset allocation. The higher your attitude to risk the more speculative your investments are. High risk carries opportunity for high returns BUT also a higher risk of losing money. Low risk has little opportunity for real growth BUT offers some stability in troubled times.
When you select an attitude to investment risk you can only ever choose based on your thinking and market conditions at the time. Because circumstances and attitudes change you need to be reviewing your attitude to risk on a regular basis.
We would recommend this be done annually.
In addition, because rising markets tend to increase the proportion of your fund which is equity based this by default increases your exposure to risk. This needs to be addressed by re balancing your fund, we recommend annually, to ensure your investments continue to reflect your own attitude.
Re balancing your fund is a term for adjusting your asset allocation back to the correct attitude to risk and should be done even if you remain invested in the same individual investments within your pension portfolio.
Reviewing your plans annually also provides the opportunity to switch some funds about if the performance has not lived up to expectation.
For simplicity and sometimes regulatory reasons many high street branded pensions have been sold with the investments selected by default in to Managed Funds. You may have been asked to select between a Cautious, Balanced or Adventurous but that is probably as far as the adviser was authorised to go.
Unfortunately these managed funds have tended to perform poorly and as our research indicates with massively different degrees of success.
To make matters worse the volatility and risk rating of many of these Managed Funds is not reflected in the title.
Further research, using information from ‘Financial Express’, indicates that on a risk rating of 1 – 10 with 1 being low and 10 being high the majority of ‘Balanced Managed Funds’ have, over the last 3 years, been rated as 8, 9 or 10.
If you are concerned about your investment returns or the risk rating of your investments you should get your pensions reviewed by an independent pension specialist as soon as possible.
Pensionlite provide free, independent, no obligation pension review and recommendation reports. Why wait – www.pensionlite.co.uk